Recently, I used AI to design a Weizenbock recipe, brewed it up, and felt it turned out well. But could a human expert do better? To find out, I recruited BJCP Grand Master judge, Matthew Herrold, from Mean Brews, who looked up award winning Weizenbock recipes, crunched the numbers, and came up with a recipe of his own. I’m brewing that then I’m taking both beers to a tasting panel of brewing professionals who know nothing about the origins of the recipes and were simply told to pick their favorite. Did they prefer the AI recipe or the human one? For that matter, which did Matthew prefer? It’s AI vs. Grand Master – who will win?
The Brülosophy Show: WEIZENBOCK CHALLENGE! AI vs. Grand Master BJCP Judge
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
Sign up to be notified when we publish new content!
Thank you to our sponsors!
Brülosophy is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for us to earn fees by linking to Amazon.com and other affiliated sites.
3 thoughts on “The Brülosophy Show: WEIZENBOCK CHALLENGE! AI vs. Grand Master BJCP Judge”
Probably the ugliest looking beer style ever.
Nah. I’ve made way uglier. It was intended to be an English style wheat beer inspired by the stirrup cup tradition…ended up being called swamp water wheat. The fruit pectins mean it never cleared–8 years on I think it’s still a murky brown.
Actually tasted good, though.
text please